Building a brain healthy United Kingdom together

Building a brain healthy United Kingdom together
Brain health underpins how we think, learn, connect, work, create and age. Our brain health is shaped throughout life by our environments, experiences, opportunities and behaviours, and can be strengthened at any age. This creates a powerful opportunity to build a better national approach to brain health, bringing together health, education, employment, research and communities through a shared platform focused on protecting, optimising and sustaining brain health across the lifespan.
“Brain health is the state of brain functioning across cognitive, sensory, social-emotional, behavioural and motor domains, allowing a person to realise their full potential over the life course, irrespective of the presence or absence of disorders.”


UKBHF is a convening platform for the UK Brain Council and Youth Brain Council. Its reach and credibility depend on the breadth and quality of the organisations and individuals that stand behind it.




The UKBHF and its convening arm, the UK Brain Council, are established to create a national framework for lifelong brain health in the United Kingdom.
Contributors:
Dr Harris Eyre, Executive Director Global Brain Economy Initiative, Senior Fellow Rice University and UTMB, Senior Advisor McKinsey Health Institute.
Harris is a physician, neuroscientist, entrepreneur, and strategist. Harris is credited for pioneering the brain economy transition across sectors and industries. He is dedicated to fostering awareness, data, tools, investment, and leadership to drive the transition.
Harris introduced the “brain economy” and “brain capital” frameworks, arguing that the UK, like many countries, currently operates a “brain‑negative” model that erodes brain capital through stress, inequality, under‑investment in mental health and education, and harmful environments. He outlined:
Global brain capital indices already suggest a downturn in brain capital and emphasised that such metrics can powerfully engage finance ministers and heads of government, not just health ministers. He described the Global Brain Economy Initiative’s work on:
Harris encouraged the UKBC to adopt a brain‑economy framing and develop a UK brain blueprint that uses brain capital metrics to shape policy and investment across sectors.
Georgina Carr, Neurological Alliance, Chief Executive. With prior leadership at the MS Society improving treatment, care and support, including on European and international MS committees. She brings expertise in neurological policy and EU health advocacy.
Georgina described the experiences of people living with neurological conditions and the policy landscape in England and the wider UK. The Alliance’s 105 members, from large charities such as Parkinson’s UK to small, volunteer‑run organisations, report that people frequently:
The Economist Intelligence Unit has estimated that neurological conditions cost the UK around £96 billion in 2019 in direct and indirect health and economic costs, roughly equivalent to the defence budget, with up to £30 billion potentially saveable if treatment, care and support were optimised.
The Alliance’s 2024 “My Neuro Survey” (over 8,500 respondents) found that:
Importantly, the respondents are predominantly White British, underscoring the need to improve diversity and equity in brain‑ and neuro‑related data and policymaking.
Georgina also outlined significant policy developments: the creation of a UK Neuro Forum to advise government on neurological policy, and a new NHS England adult neurology service specification (2025) which, for the first time, sets minimum standards for neurology services, including expectations around integrated mental and physical health.
Jaime De Mora, Brain Future Foundation, CogniGuard, EI University, Microsoft AI Professor & CTO. Jaime is speaking from his work with the Brain Future Foundation and CogniGuard, a non-profit research initiative exploring the long-term implications of artificial intelligence on human cognition. “AI-related cognitive risk as one of the most urgent and least measured threats to brain health at work.”
AI can displace critical thinking
The world has developed strong systems to measure physical performance, such as steps, sleep, and heart rate, but has not yet built equivalent ways to measure cognitive agency, cognitive independence, or cognitive sovereignty. There is early evidence from education and research settings that AI can displace critical thinking, and that moral reasoning and judgment may begin to be offloaded to AI systems when users become overly dependent on them. In this framing, the workplace risk is not simply distraction or overload, but the gradual erosion of the human capacities that underpin judgment, creativity, interpretation, and responsibility.
Two sectors emerged as having particular urgency. In education, there is concern that students may fail to build core capabilities if AI is overused or poorly governed. The second is mental health, where questions are being asked about whether AI may amplify anxiety, depression, or other vulnerabilities among some users. Many people believe they know how to use AI effectively, yet there is very little structured training in how to preserve cognitive independence while using these tools.
The missing dimension in current AI policy thinking
Many companies are focused on short-term productivity and efficiency gains rather than protecting the brain health of their employees, and cognitive protection is not top of mind in enterprise settings. This is concerning for knowledge workers, who are among the heaviest AI users and may already be experiencing a narrowing of work, where they delegate tasks through AI without exercising reflection and meaningful judgment.
AI risk is both a present operational issue and a future policy issue. The current mainstream AI governance debates often focus on fairness, transparency, accountability, and physical safety, but pay less attention to cognitive health, cognitive independence, and the preservation of human judgment. This makes brain health an important missing dimension in current AI policy thinking.
Prof. Lynne Corner, National Innovation Centre for Ageing/ NICA COO & Director. Lynne is Professor of Healthy Ageing and Engagement, and the co-founder and Director of – an international citizen organisation, dedicated to harnessing the intelligence and experience of older adults, operating successfully in over 10 countries across Europe, Asia, Australia, US and Canada, involving citizens in co-development and de-risking innovation for healthy longevity.
Lynne highlighted the concept of “brain capital”, the cognitive, emotional and social resources that underpin productivity, wellbeing, creativity and social cohesion. Her work, rooted in the UK Government’s Foresight report on mental capital and wellbeing (2008), emphasises:
VOICE, the citizen platform Lynne founded, mobilises older adults’ brain capital in ten countries across four continents, fostering intergenerational knowledge transfer and demonstrating that older people represent a major democratic, economic and social asset. The National Innovation Centre’s “City of Longevity” framework further shows how urban design (housing, green/blue space, safety, noise, pollution, social infrastructure) can be reshaped to support brain health and reduce risks such as loneliness and cognitive decline.
Lynne underlined that the annual cost of brain disorders in Europe, estimated around €800 billion, dwarfs current investments, and that brain health is highly modifiable: “we simply cannot afford not to do this.”
Dr Killian Welch, Royal College of Psychiatrists – Neuropsychiatry Faculty Consultant neuropsychiatrist. Killian is a specialist in the interface of neurology, psychiatry and addictions. His training uniquely blends imaging research in schizophrenia, cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational interviewing and neuropsychiatry academic leadership. Killian described neuropsychiatry as the bridge between neurology and psychiatry, focusing on conditions where the brain and mind are deeply entwined.
Evidence from neurology clinics shows:
He outlined several barriers to recognising and treating psychiatric comorbidity in neurological populations:
Dr Welch argued for adapting psychological therapies such as behavioural activation to neurological populations and embedding mental health expertise across neurology and rehabilitation services.
The UK Brain Health blueprint, co-produced by the brain health community, sets out a national brain health policy framework for the UK. Its purpose is to address a critical structural gap: despite world-leading neuroscience, clinical expertise, and lived-experience leadership, the UK lacks a coherent national brain health policy that brings health, education, workforce, economic, and social systems into alignment across the life course.

Through the Youth Brain Council the UKBHF recognises that youth experiences and creativity are important in building a healthier future. The YBC brings young people’s ideas into brain health conversations and decision making. Its mission is to make brain health easier to understand, more welcoming, and more useful for children and young people.
For enquiries, media and press please connect with us directly.

All rights reserved.